User Tools

Site Tools


2011:hermotimus_and_the_futility_of_philosophy

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Next revision
Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
2011:hermotimus_and_the_futility_of_philosophy [2011/12/13 22:10] – created frank2011:hermotimus_and_the_futility_of_philosophy [2013/01/02 18:52] frank
Line 1: Line 1:
 +<html>
 +
 +<a href="http://lucianofsamosata.info/wiki/doku.php?id=submission_page"><img src="http://lucianofsamosata.info/images/contact.png" /></a>
 +
 +</html>
 +
 ====== Hermotimus and the Futility of Philosophy ====== ====== Hermotimus and the Futility of Philosophy ======
  
Line 5: Line 11:
 The [[http://lucianofsamosata.info/Hermotimus.html|Hermotimus]] likes to evoke the concept of infinitude to explain why Philosophy as a subject and discipline is ultimately futile. If one man is not wise, and his teacher is not wise, and his teacher was not wise, and so on - who then is wise from the teachings of Philosophy? Infinitude is a great way to show futility as almost everything over the course of time gets degraded including in this case Philosophy. The [[http://lucianofsamosata.info/Hermotimus.html|Hermotimus]] likes to evoke the concept of infinitude to explain why Philosophy as a subject and discipline is ultimately futile. If one man is not wise, and his teacher is not wise, and his teacher was not wise, and so on - who then is wise from the teachings of Philosophy? Infinitude is a great way to show futility as almost everything over the course of time gets degraded including in this case Philosophy.
  
-Philosophy by its very nature is indeterminate - look at how Socrates refused to acknowledge that he knew anything. Lucian's contention is that when philosophers turned into dogmatists, that is when the discipline turned sour. There are a few examples of people who eschewed this characterization. One is Lucian's own example the [[http://lucianofsamosata.info/Demonax.html|Life of Demonax]]. However, Lucian's view is that Stoics, Epicureans, Platonists, etc. have all lost the original impetus of Philosophy, wonder and ignorance (e.g. indeterminate things).+Philosophy by its very nature is indeterminate - look at how Socrates refused to acknowledge that he knew anything. Lucian's contention is that when philosophers turned into dogmatists, that is when the discipline turned sour. There are a few examples of people who eschewed this characterization. One is Lucian's own example the [[http://lucianofsamosata.info/Demonax.html|Life of Demonax]]. However, Lucian's view is that [[wp>Stoics]][[wp>Epicureans]][[wp>Platonists]], etc. have all lost the original impetus of Philosophy, wonder and ignorance (e.g. indeterminate things). 
  
-{{tag>dogmatism demonax lucian hermotimus philosophy}} 
  
  
2011/hermotimus_and_the_futility_of_philosophy.txt · Last modified: 2015/12/16 10:58 by 127.0.0.1

Except where otherwise noted, content on this wiki is licensed under the following license: Public Domain
Public Domain Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki